Template:Tertiary source: Difference between revisions
Sources>Dovi |
Sources>Dovi No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[Primary source]] | * [[Primary source]] | ||
* [[Secondary source]] | * [[Secondary source]] | ||
==External links:== | |||
*'''[[:s:|Wikisource]]''' – ''The Free Library'' – is the [[Wikimedia]] project that collects, edits, and catalogues source texts. | |||
[[Category:Historiography]] | [[Category:Historiography]] |
Revision as of 09:18, 22 February 2006
Where a primary source presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a secondary source provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources, a tertiary source is a selection and compilation of primary and secondary sources. While the distinction between primary source and secondary source is essential in historiography, the distinction between these sources of evidence and tertiary sources is more peripheral.
Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles. Encyclopedias and textbooks are examples of materials that typically embrace both secondary and tertiary sources, presenting on the one hand commentary and analysis, while on the other attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic. For instance, the long articles of the Encyclopædia Britannica certainly constitute the kind of analytical material characteristic of secondary sources, whilst they also attempt to provide the kind of comprehensive coverage associated with tertiary sources.
See also
External links:
- Wikisource – The Free Library – is the Wikimedia project that collects, edits, and catalogues source texts.