Template:Tertiary source: Difference between revisions

From BitProjects
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Sources>Chalst
No edit summary
 
Sources>Chalst
Restructure, fix typo.
Line 1: Line 1:
Whereas a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources, a '''tertiary source'''  is a selection and compilation of primary and secondary sources.  Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles.
Whereas a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources, a '''tertiary source'''  is a selection and compilation of primary and secondary sources.  articles.  While the distinction between  ''primary source'' and ''secondary source'' is essential in [[historiography]] and originates there, the distinction between these sources of evidence and ''tertiary sources'' is more peripheral.


While the distinction between  ''primary source'' and ''secondary source'' is essential in [[historiography]] and originates there, the distinction between these sources of evidence and ''tertiary sources'' is not so relevant, and appears to originate in [[library science]].
Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles. [[Encyclopaedia|Encyclopaedias]] and [[textbook|textbooks]] are examples of materials that typically embrace both secondary and tertiary sources, presenting on the one hand commentary and analysis, while on the other attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic.  For instance, the long articles of the [[Encyclopaedia Britannica]] certainly constitute the kind of analytical material characteristic of secondary sources, whilst they also attempt to provide the kind of comprehensive coverage associated with tertiary sources.
 
 
[[Encyclopaedia|Encyclopaedias]] and [[Textbook|textbooks]] are examples of materials that typically straddle both secondary and tertiary sources, both presenting commentary and analysis, while attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic.  For instance, the long articles of the [[Enclyclopaedia Britannica]] certainly constitute the kind of analytical material characteristic of secondary sources, whilst also attempting to provide the kind of comprehensive coverage assocaited with tertiary sources.


[[Category:Historiography]] [[Category:Library and information science]]
[[Category:Historiography]] [[Category:Library and information science]]

Revision as of 05:04, 22 September 2004

Whereas a primary source presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a secondary source provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources, a tertiary source is a selection and compilation of primary and secondary sources. articles. While the distinction between primary source and secondary source is essential in historiography and originates there, the distinction between these sources of evidence and tertiary sources is more peripheral.

Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles. Encyclopaedias and textbooks are examples of materials that typically embrace both secondary and tertiary sources, presenting on the one hand commentary and analysis, while on the other attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic. For instance, the long articles of the Encyclopaedia Britannica certainly constitute the kind of analytical material characteristic of secondary sources, whilst they also attempt to provide the kind of comprehensive coverage associated with tertiary sources.