Template:Primary source: Difference between revisions

From BitProjects
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Sources>Bryan Derksen
wikified
Line 1: Line 1:
A primary historical source is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the historical events that are being described.
A '''primary historical source''' is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the [[history|historical]] events that are being described.


The most common primary sources are journal entries or letters.
The most common primary sources are [[journal]] entries or [[letter]]s.


As a general rule, modern historians prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources.  
As a general rule, modern [[historian]]s prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources.  


See Also [[Secondary source]]
See Also [[Secondary source]]

Revision as of 09:30, 13 April 2003

A primary historical source is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the historical events that are being described.

The most common primary sources are journal entries or letters.

As a general rule, modern historians prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources.

See Also Secondary source