Template:Primary source: Difference between revisions
Infobox>Angela m fmt |
Sources>Reddi mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''primary historical source''' is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the [[history|historical]] events that are being described. | A '''primary historical source''' is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the [[history|historical]] events that are being described. These are also usually authoritative and fundamental documents concerning the subject under consideration. This includes published original accounts, published original works, or published original research. Physical objects can be primary sources. | ||
The most common primary sources are [[journal]] entries or [[letter]]s. | The most common primary sources are [[journal]] entries or [[letter]]s. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*[[Secondary source]] | |||
* [[Secondary source]] | |||
Revision as of 15:15, 13 February 2004
A primary historical source is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the historical events that are being described. These are also usually authoritative and fundamental documents concerning the subject under consideration. This includes published original accounts, published original works, or published original research. Physical objects can be primary sources.
The most common primary sources are journal entries or letters.
As a general rule, modern historians prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources.