Template:Primary source: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Infobox>Bryan Derksen wikified |
Sources>Angela m fmt |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As a general rule, modern [[historian]]s prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources. | As a general rule, modern [[historian]]s prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources. | ||
See | ==See also== | ||
*[[Secondary source]] | |||
Revision as of 23:06, 31 August 2003
A primary historical source is any piece of information that was created by someone who witnessed first hand or was part of the historical events that are being described.
The most common primary sources are journal entries or letters.
As a general rule, modern historians prefer to go back to primary sources, if available, as well as seeking new ones. A work on history is not likely to be taken seriously if it only cites secondary sources. This of course does not preclude secondary sources being used as a guide to find and interpret primary sources.