Template:Tertiary source: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Sources>AnomieBOT m Dating maintenance tags: {{Citation needed}} |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and [[textbook]]s attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source). | As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and [[textbook]]s attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source). | ||
In some [[academic discipline]]s the distinction between a secondary and tertiary source is relative,<ref>[http://www.lib.umd.edu/guides/primary-sources.html Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources, UM Libraries]</ref><ref name=JCU /> but in [[historiography]] it is absolute.{{citation needed}} | In some [[academic discipline]]s the distinction between a secondary and tertiary source is relative,<ref>[http://www.lib.umd.edu/guides/primary-sources.html Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources, UM Libraries]</ref><ref name=JCU /> but in [[historiography]] it is absolute.{{citation needed|date=August 2012}} | ||
In the [[UNISIST model]], a secondary source is a bibliography, whereas a tertiary source is a synthesis of primary sources.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1108/00220410310472509}}</ref> | In the [[UNISIST model]], a secondary source is a bibliography, whereas a tertiary source is a synthesis of primary sources.<ref>{{cite doi|10.1108/00220410310472509}}</ref> | ||
Revision as of 04:44, 10 August 2012
A tertiary source is an index and/or textual condensation of primary and secondary sources.[1][2][3]
Some examples of tertiary sources are almanacs, guide books, survey articles, timelines, and user guides. Depending on the topic of research, a scholar may use a bibliography, dictionary, or encyclopedia as either a tertiary or a secondary source.[1]
As tertiary sources, encyclopedias and textbooks attempt to summarize and consolidate the source materials into an overview, but may also present subjective commentary and analysis (which are characteristics of a secondary source).
In some academic disciplines the distinction between a secondary and tertiary source is relative,[4][3] but in historiography it is absolute.Template:Citation needed
In the UNISIST model, a secondary source is a bibliography, whereas a tertiary source is a synthesis of primary sources.[5]
See also
Notes
de:Sekundärliteratur#Tertiärliteratur es:Fuente terciaria fa:منبع ثالثه fr:Source tertiaire hr:Tercijarne publikacije id:Sumber tersier he:מקור שלישוני hu:Harmadlagos forrás mk:Терцијарни извори на информации fi:Tertiäärilähde zh:三次文献
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 University of Maryland Libraries (2001) "Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources"
- ↑ Glossary, Using Information Resources
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Primary, Secondary & Tertiary Sources - James Cook University
- ↑ Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources, UM Libraries
- ↑ Template:Cite doi