Template:Tertiary source: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Sources>Neo-Jay added section header Notes |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
By contrast, a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources | By contrast, a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources | ||
==Notes== | |||
{{reflist|2}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
Revision as of 06:14, 15 October 2007
A tertiary source is a selection, distillation, summary or compilation of primary sources, secondary sources, or both.[1][2] The distinction between primary source and secondary source is standard in historiography, while the distinction between these sources and tertiary sources is more peripheral, and is more relevant to the scholarly research work than to the published content itself.
Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles. Encyclopedias and textbooks are examples of materials that typically embrace both secondary and tertiary sources, presenting on the one hand commentary and analysis, while on the other attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic.
By contrast, a primary source presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a secondary source provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources
Notes
See also
es:Fuente terciaria fi:Tertiäärilähde fr:Source tertiaire id:Sumber tersier ja:三次資料 zh:三级文献
- ↑ See, e.g., University of Maryland Libraries (2001) "Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources"
- ↑ See, e.g. Glossary, Using Information Resources. ("Tertiary Source" is defined as "reference material that synthesizes work already reported in primary or secondary sources".)