Template:Tertiary source: Difference between revisions
Sources>K reference |
Sources>K reflist template |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
By contrast, a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources | By contrast, a [[primary source]] presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a [[secondary source]] provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources | ||
{{reflist|2}} | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 01:14, 25 September 2007
A tertiary source is a selection, distillation, summary or compilation of primary sources, secondary sources, or both.[1][2] The distinction between primary source and secondary source is standard in historiography, the distinction between these sources and tertiary sources is more peripheral, and is more relevant to the scholarly work than to the content itself.
Typical instances of tertiary sources are bibliographies, library catalogs, directories, reading lists and survey articles. Encyclopedias and textbooks are examples of materials that typically embrace both secondary and tertiary sources, presenting on the one hand commentary and analysis, while on the other attempting to provide a synoptic overview of the material available on the topic.
By contrast, a primary source presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a secondary source provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources
See also
es:Fuente terciaria fr:Source tertiaire id:Sumber tersier ja:三次資料 zh:三级文献
- ↑ See, e.g., University of Maryland Libraries (2001) "Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sources"
- ↑ See, e.g. Glossary, Using Information Resources. ("Tertiary Source" is defined as "reference material that synthesizes work already reported in primary or secondary sources".