Template:Primary source: Revision history

19 November 2007

• curprev 23:3023:30, 19 November 2007 64.237.4.140 talk 14,549 bytes −10,146 Get-a-clue bot needs fixing.
• curprev 23:2823:28, 19 November 2007 Sources>ClueBot 24,695 bytes +10,146 Reverting possible vandalism by Special:Contributions/64.237.4.140 to version by COGDEN. If this is a mistake, report it. Thanks, ClueBot. (79197) (Bot)
• curprev 23:2823:28, 19 November 2007 64.237.4.140 talk 14,549 bytes −10,146 I'm restoring the last version of this article that did not give undue weight to more obscure definitions.
• curprev 23:1423:14, 19 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 24,695 bytes +3,317 →Typical primary sources in various disciplines
• curprev 22:4122:41, 19 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 21,378 bytes +644 →Source classification: Add citation.
• curprev 22:1622:16, 19 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 20,734 bytes +407 →Source classification: Add content.

17 November 2007

• curprev 19:4119:41, 17 November 2007 Sources>Dave souza 20,327 bytes −3 put qualification of statement after statement, no info added or removed
• curprev 18:4118:41, 17 November 2007 Sources>Jim62sch 20,330 bytes 0 Undid revision 172124210 by Jim62sch (talk)damnit, these refs are so screwed up editing is a bitch
• curprev 18:4018:40, 17 November 2007 Sources>Jim62sch 20,330 bytes 0 edit for clarity -- the caveat should come after the statement
• curprev 01:0901:09, 17 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 20,330 bytes +2,338 As a compromise, this edit includes all material from yesterday to today. Nothing is deleted that was there yesterday, just added. If there are any NPOV issues, please revise rather than revert.

16 November 2007

• curprev 20:5520:55, 16 November 2007 64.237.4.140 talk 17,992 bytes −1,926 You are simply mistaken COGDEN
• curprev 20:2020:20, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 19,918 bytes +1,926 See talk page. Wikipedia does not censor. If you think that a contrasting POV exists in the literature, please ''add'' it, but don't suppress the conclusions written in these sources.
• curprev 19:1919:19, 16 November 2007 Sources>Jim62sch 17,992 bytes −1,926 rv to last good version. Stop with your campaign cogden -- weakening psts will not help you
• curprev 19:1019:10, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN m 19,918 bytes +10 add conjunction
• curprev 19:0919:09, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 19,908 bytes +23 →Strengths and weaknesses of primary sources
• curprev 19:0819:08, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 19,885 bytes +671 →Strengths and weaknesses of primary sources
• curprev 18:5518:55, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 19,214 bytes −82 A redundant sentence.
• curprev 18:4718:47, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 19,296 bytes +1,200 →Source classification
• curprev 18:3218:32, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 18,096 bytes +192 These library help pages don't actually support the sentence for which they are cited (). Replace with a different statement and reliable citation.
• curprev 18:0718:07, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 17,904 bytes −237 →Source classification
• curprev 17:5417:54, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 18,141 bytes +149 →Source classification: Statement and citation.
• curprev 14:1714:17, 16 November 2007 Sources>K m 17,992 bytes +12 →Typical primary sources in various disciplines: providing synopsis of usage across disciplines, with citation that was provided by User:Rjm at sleepers on Talk:Secondary source. wikilinks
• curprev 14:1514:15, 16 November 2007 Sources>K m 17,980 bytes −3 →Typical primary sources in various disciplines: providing synopsis of usage across disciplines, with citation that was provided by User:Rjm at sleepers on Talk:Secondary source
• curprev 13:5913:59, 16 November 2007 Sources>K 17,983 bytes −2 →Typical primary sources in various disciplines: providing synopsis of usage across disciplines, with citation that was provided by User:Rjm at sleepers on Talk:Secondary source
• curprev 13:5813:58, 16 November 2007 Sources>K 17,985 bytes +1,040 →Typical primary sources in various disciplines: provide synopsis of usage across disciplines, with citation that was provided by User:Rjm at sleepers on Talk:Secondary source
• curprev 02:2202:22, 16 November 2007 Sources>K 16,945 bytes +234 Replacing, again, two reliable sources from collegiate libraries that offer a standard description and examples in the context of library and information science
• curprev 00:4100:41, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN m 16,711 bytes +1 fix citation
• curprev 00:4100:41, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 16,710 bytes +899 Add one more reliable citation as to definition.
• curprev 00:1500:15, 16 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 15,811 bytes +360 Add one more reliable citation.

15 November 2007

• curprev 23:5423:54, 15 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 15,451 bytes +207 add quotation for first source.
• curprev 23:5223:52, 15 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 15,244 bytes +695 Reinsert deleted reliable source, and add another reliable source from a peer-reviewed library sciences journal.
• curprev 18:2318:23, 15 November 2007 64.237.4.140 talk 14,549 bytes −252 Gotta agree with Kenosis on this one.
• curprev 17:3017:30, 15 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 14,801 bytes +252 See talk page. Removed unreliable sources, replaced with reliable source.
• curprev 15:1115:11, 15 November 2007 Sources>K 14,549 bytes +54 Replacing important distinction. Historiography & other scholarchip produces original research. Library and information science facilitates research but doesn't produc original research.
• curprev 09:5109:51, 15 November 2007 Sources>Rjm at sleepers 14,495 bytes −20 closest to the origin of the information or idea under study is an attribute not a definition

14 November 2007

• curprev 19:1119:11, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 14,515 bytes −22 rmvg "generally regarded as". Primary sources are always closest to the point of origin
• curprev 19:0119:01, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 14,537 bytes −161 redundant sentence, & move footnote
• curprev 18:5918:59, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 14,698 bytes −132 Redundant sentence
• curprev 18:5818:58, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 14,830 bytes −263 Removing redundant sentence(s)
• curprev 18:5718:57, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 15,093 bytes +75 clarifying that the relationship of source classification to "independence and reliability" is in SCHOLARLY WRITING
• curprev 18:5418:54, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 15,018 bytes +6 Format bold
• curprev 18:5218:52, 14 November 2007 Sources>K 15,012 bytes +497 Replacing cited material, and working from the general to the specific, as expected in WP
• curprev 17:1617:16, 14 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 14,515 bytes +13 Minor change in intro.

13 November 2007

• curprev 19:3419:34, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN m 14,502 bytes +123 →Strengths and weaknesses of primary sources: add url
• curprev 19:3019:30, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 14,379 bytes +455 →Strengths and weaknesses of primary sources
• curprev 19:1319:13, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 13,924 bytes +18 →Source classification
• curprev 19:1219:12, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN m 13,906 bytes −1 →Source classification
• curprev 19:1119:11, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 13,907 bytes +123 →Source classification
• curprev 18:5418:54, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 13,784 bytes −234 Delete two footnotes to web pages that are not reliable sources.
• curprev 18:4318:43, 13 November 2007 Sources>COGDEN 14,018 bytes +1,485 Source classification section, from historiography text